That’s 300 $10 husngs down. Two hundred to go.
No sign of my game improving, apart from now I run under ev rather than over it (hard to tell on graph above, but gap between the red & green are narrowing). At this rate I’ll be ev-neutral as I hit the 500 game mark. Possibly that’s a sign I’m getting it right though – if you were to go all-in ahead of your opponent every time, then you could only ever be under EV (and vice versa). Which means players who are over-EV (as I was) are probably getting it in bad more often than not, while players under-EV are getting it in good more often than not.
So it’s good to be under-EV?
well you could still be over ev for example fi you got aa vs kk 10x in a row and won every single time you would be running above expecation since you should win 80% of the time and lose 20% but instead you won 100% and lost 20%
That’s true. I’m a definite believer that the EV graph is flawed because we compare our actual wins to the EV line. The true comparison should be the Sklansky bucks vs actual won Sklansky bucks, ie your AA vs KK, if you win it both lines go up 80% of pot (all’s well with the world, you’re exactly winning what you should be), while if you lose it the actual won Sklansky bucks won goes down (um, by 20% I think). If you get in as a 30% dog and suck out, then actual won goes up 30% of pot while true Sklansky bucks goes down 70%.
The comparison would be much more accurate in representing your ‘luck’ factor.