Ok, now I’m not so keen on Rush Poker.
This is the graph to date of playing RP;
Mostly in the black I guess, so I shouldn’t be too harsh on it. However the last session (last 600 hands) was a really depressing pit of despair. One of those times you hit nothing while all around you do, bullets and cowboys get no action and the hands that do get all-in action find themselves outgunned
The thing I hate the most though is my redline – I’ll admit I’m not one of those players who have a solid upwardly mobile graph, but when I am doing ok it’s usually red and blue in reasonable tandem. A few bad showdown failures are compensated by the non-showdown and it all looks nice and symmetrical. Today I realised constantly playing against unknowns on Rush Poker meant you couldn’t profitably punish the bluffers or extract from the calling stations. You either get good cards or you don’t.
I am wondering why my swings are so huge though. They’re all about 6 or 7 buy-ins – that’s not normal surely? People get worried when they have a 3 or 4 buy-in dive, over 8 is a downswing of death. Run of the mill for me it seems.
Unfortunately that last downswing has really taken it out of my bankroll – it now stands at a crappy $208. That’s less than a buy-in to the NL5 move down point! Rakeback ought to be about $50 from this rushing around though, but it won’t be in my account for another three weeks.
Oh well.
OTOH my blog’s doing well
The big jump in the last week was because I broke the news about rush poker so quickly – Google sent me loads of people who were searching about the game. Wore off pretty quickly though…
























1.10BI swings are so standard
2.now you have perfect BR for $10 husngs (http://files.myopera.com/velmu/blog/pacman.gif)
3.rakeback on FT is dealt every friday..no?
1. Really? That’s a relief. As long as it’s 10bi swings daily…
ok, ok, I’ll try husngs
2. haha, v funny
3. Depends on your affiliate. Mine’s monthly I’m afraid.
Doesn’t look so bad bro, a bit of a roller coaster but not as devastating as the title of the post was implying.